MSC adding progressive table jackpots on its U.S. ships
Replies
My default reaction is the same as yours: the headline matters a lot less than the underlying game. If the side bet is funding the progressive but the blackjack or poker variant has weaker rules, I’d treat it as window dressing. I could see it pulling a little bankroll away from slots for people who already prefer tables, mostly for the novelty, but not changing my overall play much.
What I’d want to know is which games get it and what the side wager costs. Three Card Poker style progressives feel very different from blackjack add-ons. Did the article say which U.S. ships are getting it first?
I’m with y’all on wanting the fine print before I get too excited. A progressive on a table game can be fun in that “well now I’m curious” kind of way, but if it turns a quick low-key session into a pile of side bets, I’ll probably stick to my usual Three Card or poker room if the ship has one. Denise loves that big-jackpot sizzle on slots, so I can see MSC trying to borrow a little of that energy for the table crowd. What I’d really like to know is whether the jackpot is ship-specific or linked across multiple ships, because that changes the buzz a good bit.
I’d mostly look at it as a time-on-device tool for MSC, not a reason by itself to move bankroll. Progressives tend to add a fixed side-bet drain, and on a cruise that matters because a lot of us are already playing shorter sessions than in a land casino. If I’m budgeting, I’d separate it mentally: core bankroll for the base game, tiny “lottery ticket” bucket for the progressive.
What I’m curious about is whether MSC ties any casino tracking to the side bet differently than the main wager. Some systems do, some don’t, and that changes the real cost of chasing the shiny meter.